Loading Session...

Missing Risk Factors of Automated Driving System

Session Information

We are able to consider the various risk factors when considering automotive safety: for example, malfunction, imperfect environmental recognition, and security violation. We have standards to treat those hazard types: ISO 26262 (functional safety), ISO/PAS 21448 (SoTIF) and SAE J3061 (security), respectively. However, those risk factors don't cover all. We can distinguish the factors relating to the collaboration of multiple ADASs or the difficulty of the decision of motion planner[1][2].In this paper, we provide the approach to identify the risk factors through analyzing the interface classes, that are communication between the environment-system, user-system, and system-system. We'll show the result of this analysis, and we believe this is useful for us to identify the hazard of the system from SAE level 2 to level 5.?

[1] https://doi.org/10.20485/jsaeijae.10.1_14

[2] Ito, Masao. "Method of Evaluating the Influence Factor of Safety in the Automated Driving System: The Chasm Between SAE Level 2 and Level 3." European Conference on Software Process Improvement. 2018.

07-30-2019 03:45 PM - 04:30 PM(America/New_York)
Venue : Hampton 4
20190730T1545 20190730T1630 America/New_York Missing Risk Factors of Automated Driving System

We are able to consider the various risk factors when considering automotive safety: for example, malfunction, imperfect environmental recognition, and security violation. We have standards to treat those hazard types: ISO 26262 (functional safety), ISO/PAS 21448 (SoTIF) and SAE J3061 (security), respectively. However, those risk factors don't cover all. We can distinguish the factors relating to the collaboration of multiple ADASs or the difficulty of the decision of motion planner[1][2].In this paper, we provide the approach to identify the risk factors through analyzing the interface classes, that are communication between the environment-system, user-system, and system-system. We'll show the result of this analysis, and we believe this is useful for us to identify the hazard of the system from SAE level 2 to level 5.?

[1] https://doi.org/10.20485/jsaeijae.10.1_14

[2] Ito, Masao. "Method of Evaluating the Influence Factor of Safety in the Automated Driving System: The Chasm Between SAE Level 2 and Level 3." European Conference on Software Process Improvement. 2018.

Hampton 4 37th International System Safety Conference isssconferences@system-safety.org
930 visits

Session Participants

User Online
Session speakers, moderators & attendees
CEO
,
NIL Software Corp.
No moderator for this session!
No attendee has checked-in to this session!
20 attendees saved this session

Session Chat

Live Chat
Chat with participants attending this session

Questions & Answers

Answered
Submit questions for the presenters

Session Polls

Active
Participate in live polls

Need Help?

Technical Issues?

If you're experiencing playback problems, try adjusting the quality or refreshing the page.

Questions for Speakers?

Use the Q&A tab to submit questions that may be addressed in follow-up sessions.